L’Italia fatta in casa

Alberto Alesina

Professor of Economics

Department of Economics

Harvard University

e-mail: aalesina@harvard.edu

 

with the research assistance of

 

Dorian Carloni

Master of Science student in Economics

Bocconi University

e-mail: dorian.carloni@studbocconi.it

Andrea Ichino

Professor of Economics
Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche
Università di Bologna

e-mail: andrea.ichino@unibo.it


 

 

Giampaolo Lecce

Master of Science student in Economics

Bocconi University

e-mail: glecce@studbocconi.it

In this website you can download the data used in this book and some documentation

(feel free to contact us for questions related to the book or to this website)



Summary

Italians feel that the "family'' plays a crucial economic role in their society because it produces a large amount of goods and services that contribute to the welfare of Italians but are not considered by official statistics. This book studies to what extent this feeling corresponds to reality.

 

We use time use and wage data for Italy, US, Norway and Spain, and measure, with different methods, the average value of individual market and home work in each of these countries. Undoubtedly the evidence shows that Italy's position in terms of GDP with respect to comparable countries would improve considerably if official statistics  considered home production together with production for the market.

 

The book then proceeds to highlight the other face of the substantial benefits produced by the Italian family, represented by its costs in terms of gender differences, social capital, educational system, labor market and the welfare state. We show that the economic effects of the family, positive or negative, can travel very far from the living room of a household.

 

In this web site you can download the micro-data used in the book and some documentation. We plan to extend the analysis to more countries with the goal of producing a scientific publication on the value of home production.

 

Comments and suggestions are very welcome, in particular if any mistake remains in what we did.

Back to the top


Research approach

In order to estimate the value of market and home production in the four countries that we have considered, we proceeded in two steps.

·     First we extracted time use data from the Multinational Time Use Study (MTUS), and reclassified individuals’ reported daily activities into three main aggregates: paid work, home production and leisure, as described below.

·     Second we assigned an economic value to those activities using wage data obtained from representative surveys of the population in each country. Time dedicated to home production was evaluated with two methods:

·      The Opportunity Cost method, which evaluates each hour of home production at the potential alternative wage that each individual can receive in the market.

·      The Market Cost method, which evaluates each hour of home production at the cost at which home services can be bought in the market, measured as the unskilled wage.

For further details see our book and this reference: Katharine G. Abraham and Christopher D. MacKie (ed), Beyond the Market: Designing Nonmarket Accounts for the United States, Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2005.

The final dataset (book_4.dta) in Stata format, and the Stata code that we have used to create and analyze this file from the original data sources can be downloaded here.

The original data must be requested to the provider. In what follows you will find more information on these sources..

Back to the top


Time use data

The Multinational Time Use Study (MTUS) contains cross-country comparable data on time spent by a representative sample of the population in 41 activities during a random working day of a week. We focused on the most recent time use data available for Italy (2002), the US (2003), Spain (2002) and Norway (2000), and considered exclusively individuals 20 to 74 years old. We used the original data files named MTUSW552.dta and MTUSW_53.dta (accessible to registered users at www.timeuse.org) and classified the 41 activities in three groups, as described below.

PAID WORK

HOUSEHOLD WORK

LEISURE

AV1 PAID WORK

AV6 COOKING/WASHING UP

AV4  SCHOOL/CLASSES

AV2 PAID WORK AT HOME

AV7 HOUSEWORK

AV14 RECEIVING PERSONAL SERVICES

AV3 SECOND JOB

AV8 ODD JOBS

AV15 MEALS/SNACKS

AV5 TRAVEL TO/FROM JOB

AV9 GARDENING

AV16 SLEEP/NAPS

AV10 SHOPPING

AV17 LEISURE TRAVEL

AV11 CHILD CARE

AV18 EXCURSION, TRIPS

AV12 DOMESTIC TRAVEL

AV19 PLAYING SPORTS

AV13 DRESS/PERSONAL CARE

AV20 WATCHING SPORTS

AV21 WALKS

AV22 AT CHURCH

AV23 CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS

AV24 CINEMA/THEATRE

AV25 DANCE/PARTY

AV26 SOCIAL CLUBS

AV27 PUBS

AV28 RESTAURANTS

AV29 VISITING FRIENDS

AV30 LISTENING TO RADIO

AV31 WATCHING TV

AV32 LISTENING TO MUSIC

AV34 READING BOOKS

AV35 READING PAPERS/MAGAZINES

AV36 RELAXING

AV37 CONVERSATION

AV38 ENTERTAINING FRIENDS

AV39 KNITTING/SEWING

AV40 PASTIMES/HOBBIES

AV41 UNKNOWN ACTIVITIES

A more detailed description of each activity and of the weights (the variable: PROPWT) needed to go from the sample to the original population, can be found at http://www.timeuse.org/mtus/documentation/

Time use data do not contain information on individual wages. Therefore, to attribute values to the time spent in the different activities we had to get wage information from different sources as described below.

Back to the top


Wage data

Wage data were obtained separately for each country, as described below. For each country we created cells of individuals defined by sex, age and level of education. For each of these cells we computed the average net and gross hourly wages. We assigned to each individual in the time use dataset the average net and gross hourly wage of the corresponding cell.

To convert monetary values for the US and Norway into Euros, we used exchange rate information provided by the OECD  in the publication «OECD Factbook 2008: Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics»,

Back to the top


Italy

We used data for 2002 and 2004 extracted from the “Survey on Household Income and Wealth (SHIW)” collected by the Bank of Italy. The data are available for download at http://www.bancaditalia.it/statistiche/indcamp/bilfait. The survey contains yearly net earnings and hours worked for a sample of the Italian population. With this information we computed net hourly wages for Italian non-self-employed workers aged 20 to74, by sex age and education. Maria Rosaria Marino of the Bank of Italy kindly provided us with data on workers’ gross wages. All computations were performed using the weight PESOFL, to obtain representative statistics for the Italian population.

Back to the top


USA

We used data from the 2003 “Current Population Survey (CPS)”, conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data are freely available on the NBER website at http://www.nber.org/data/current-population-survey-data.html . Particularly useful for our analysis was the 2003 CPS March Supplement, which contains extensive information on annual gross wages, taxes, social contributions (Federal Income Contributions Act (FICA) tax) and hours worked. We considered only employed workers 20 to74 years old and created a dataset with hourly net and gross wages by sex, age and level of education. All computations were performed using the weight MARSUPWT, included in CPS March Supplement 2003, to obtain representative statistics for the US population.

Back to the top


Spain

We used data from the 2002 “Encuesta de estructura salarial (EES)” conducted by the Spanish “Instituto Nacional de Estatistica”, which were kindly made available to us by Prof. Samuel Bentolila of CEMFI. The dataset contains extensive information on monthly gross wages, social contributions, taxes and hours worked in Spain. We calculated net and gross hourly wages by sex, age and level of education and considered only individuals 20 to 74 years old.

Back to the top


Norway

We used Census data collected by “Statistics Norway” in 2001. In the case of this country we could not access individual data, for privacy reasons. We therefore asked and received average gross yearly earnings by sex, age and level of education, computed by “Statistics Norway”. We are grateful to Prof. Oddbjorn Raaum of the Ragnar Frisch Center for Economic Research who put us in touch with “Statistics Norway”. We then estimated annual net earnings using the information on tax rates and social security contributions published on the “OECD Tax Database”. Finally hourly wages were computed using information on the average annual hours worked in Norway as reported by the OECD.

 Back to the top


Press reviews

Il Sole24ore, 15 Novembre 2009 Il Foglio, 17 Novembre 2009 Vanity Fair, 18 Novembre 2009
Il Sussidiario, 19 Novembre 2009 L'Adige, 22 Novembre 2009 Zapping, 23 Novembre 2009
Radio_1_nudo_e_crudo, 24 Novembre 2009 Radio_3_fahrenheit, 24 Novembre 2009 www.lavoce.info 25 Novembre 2009 e relativi commenti
Presentazione all'Universita' Bocconi, 26Novembre 2009 WWW.C6.TV, 26 Novembre 2009 Redattore sociale, 26 Novembre 2009
Tg_1, 29 Novembre 2009 Corriere della Sera, 27 Novembre 2009 Francesco Giavazzi, Corriere della Sera, 29 Novembre 2009
Corriere della Sera, 1 Dicembre 2009 Arena di Verona, 1 Dicembre 2009 BresciaOggi, 1 Dicembre 2009
  La Repubblica, 1 Dicembre 2009 Il Sussidiario, 2 Dicembre 2009 La Stampa, 2 Dicembre 2009
\Gazzetta dello Sport, 2 Dicembre 2009 Rai 1 Ultime da Babele, 2 Dicembre 2009 Il Sussidiario, 3 Dicembre 2009
Sky TV, Watch dog, 3 Dicembre 2009 Rai 1, Porta a Porta, 3 Dicembre 2009 Il Sussidiario, 4 Dicembre 2009
Fare futuro, 4 Dicembre 2009 Porta a porta, 4 Dicembre 2009 Il Sussidiario, 7 Dicembre 2009
Il Sussidiario, 9 Dicembre 2009, A Il Sussidiario, 9 Dicembre 2009, B Giornale di Sicilia, 9 Dicembre 2009
Corriere del Mezzogiorno, 9 Dicembre 2009 Il Sussidiario, 11 Dicembre 2009 Il Sole24ore, 13 Dicembre 2009
Tempi, 23 Dicembre 2009 www.lavoce.info, 30 dicembre 2009 Il sussidiario, 5 gennaio 2010
Famiglia Cristiana, gennaio 2010 Relazione Cardinal Antonellli, dicembre 2009 TV: CFN Partita Doppia, 13 gennaio 2010
Mattino di Padova, 13 gennaio 2010 Corriere della Sera, 14 gennaio 2010  Business People, 19 gennaio 2010
La Nazione, 19 gennaio 2010 Corriere del Mezzogiorno, 19 gennaio 2010  Luca Ricolfi, La Stampa, 19 gennaio 2010
Marco Vitale, Vita, gennaio 2010 Madeleine Johnson, The American in Italia, 17 gennaio 2010 Beppe Severgnini, Radio Montecarlo, 20 gennaio 2010
Panorama economia, 20 gennaio 2010 Pierangelo Giovannetti, Adige, 26 gennaio 2010 Stefano Fassina, Unita, 31 dicembre 2009
Maria Ida Germontani, Disegno di legge sulla detassazione del lavoro femminile, gennaio 2010 Luigino Bruni, Avvenire, 5 febbraio 2010 Marco Cobianchi su Brunetta e i Bamboccioni, Panorama.it, 3 febbraio 2010
Andrea Ichino, Intervista a The Magazine Post 19 gennaio 2010 Riassunto della presentazione organizzata da "The Ruling Companies", il 19 gennaio a Milano Ieropoli, Il Denaro, 3 marzo 2010
Terre di Mezzo, febbraio 2010 Andrea Ichino, Radio Citta' del Capo, 2 Marzo 2010

Andrea Ichino, www.lavoce.info, 8 Marzo 2010 e risposta di Del Boca e Rosina

Ichino e Alesina, Sole24ore, 7 Marzo 2010( e testo word)

Cobianchi, il sussidiario.net, 11 marzo 2010 Andrea Ichino, Intervista al il sussidiario.net, 12 marzo 2010
Tommaso Nannicini, Le ragioni del socialismo, marzo 2010 Andrea Ichino, Intervista a The American in Italia 20 marzo 2010 Mara Gasbarrone, InGenere.it, aprile 2010
Alberto Alesina, Intervista all'Adige, Giugno 2010 Andrea Ichino, Presentazione alla Scuola Galileiana di Padova, 5 maggio 2010 Tonia Mastrobuoni, Il riformista, 8 giugno 2010
Intervista di Andrea Ichino a Vanity Web, Luglio 2010 L'Italia al Bivio: un nuovo ruolo per le donne, dibattito con Enrico Morando, Monica D'Ascenzo, Andrea Ichino, Silvana Tiberti e Aurelia Destro, Ovada,1 ottobre 2010 Chiara Zamim on Sole24ore, February 15, 2011 and on her blog

 Back to the top